Please leave comments, email directly to hpoconnell@yahoo.ie or follow on Twitter @henrypoconnell

Thursday 4 June 2020

Guest blog: part 2 of the Dr. Kevin Lally trilogy; medical education during a global pandemic



Thanks to the high quality of recent guest blogs and the interest and support of colleagues, this blog has now had over 2,000 reads with the readership coming from 18 countries and spread over all continents (apart from Antarctica, but I'm hoping to see readership taking off there soon).

Dr. Kevin Lally started his trilogy last week with a very timely and pandemic-relevant piece on telemedicine and telepsychiatry:


Kevin has followed up last week's contribution with another belter of a blog this week, where he combines his experience as Clinical Tutor with the University of Limerick during this strangest of academic years with a really lively and thorough review of issues relating to designing and delivering medical education during COVID-19 and beyond.

For added colour this week, I have included some images from Danish illustrator Kay Nielsen (1886-1957), of whom Kevin is a fan.

So it's over to Kevin again...



Teaching Psychiatry during 

a Global Pandemic


The COVID-19 pandemic has brought many challenges to the delivery of medical education both at an undergraduate and post-graduate level. Universities and Post-Graduate training bodies have had to act quickly and creatively to address these challenges. Perhaps an unexpected outcome was the opportunity to assess both what we teach and how we deliver it as we grapple with what is essential in times of global crisis.



Medical school - Who cares and why?


One’s first impression, especially if we look at the severity of the situation in Italy in March 2020 would be to postpone everything relating to medical education. At home and abroad medical services were being prepared for a surge of presentations that could tax the most robust health systems and potentially overload those that are chronically under resourced.  The University of Limerick’s COVID action group were preparing to convert campus facilities into a field hospital (https://www.ul.ie/covid-home/covid-action-group/covid-action-group-facilities) and university staff were preparing to return to full-time clinical duties at the expense of academic requirements.

In response to the pandemic primary and secondary schools were closed, and universities were shut down. However, medical schools and other health professional training bodies had an obligation to progress their students and send them on to clinical action. The UL Graduate Entry Medical school (https://www.ul.ie/gems/) had 125 such students who were prepared to join the workforce. 

If medical schools had closed and decided not to graduate any students in 2020 not only would there be a critical shortage of Interns this year but also a massive excess in 2021. There would likely be a domino effect as post-graduate training bodies would have a year in which they would have inadequate numbers followed by a year of having too many applicants.  Furthermore, there was no guarantee that things would get “back to normal” by 2021 with potential for further disruption and backlog.

A second approach that was considered nationally and internationally was to “just pass everyone” or to pass as many as possible based on previous or projected grades (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/15/uk-medical-schools-urged-to-fast-track-final-year-students-to-help-fight-coronavirus).  This indeed may be a reasonable and pragmatic approach especially as the pass rates in “Final Med” tends to be 95%+ with the excess passing by supplementation. However, each individual medical school is tightly regulated by the standards of the Medical Council with regards to competencies for qualifying students and by their own universities in terms of applying grades. Furthermore, medical students are ranked based on their performance in their evaluations with regards to their applications to the Intern matching scheme.

Thus there are at least three major stakeholders in these decisions. The first are the students themselves who are not only worried about passing and failing, but also about their rank and perhaps most importantly their competency to start clinical practice. The next is the medical school or post-graduate training body which needs to be fair to students but also uphold the standards of their regulators. Finally, the medical council, acting on behalf of the general public is invested to ensure that those students who join the medical register are fit to do so.







The Show Must Go On


At this point we have decided we cannot:

·         Put everything on pause and see what happens after the closure of the pandemic

·         Just pass all students

·         Continue as previous

Thus the inevitable solution was to adapt and modify the teaching practices to train the students to the highest standard possible, assess fairly and evaluate accurately. There was a new impetus to do this as quickly as possible with a view to starting Internship as early as possible so that new doctors can join the workforce.




Switching from traditional learning environment to an exclusively online learning environment


There is ample literature on the merits of adopting blended learning strategies in medical education and indeed guidance on introducing online learning into the traditional model. However, these are all from the perspective from a very gradual and incremental change rather than a complete conversion over a weekend mid-semester. The fundamental requirements are:

·         A functional virtual learning environment (VLE)

·         a robust video conferencing suite

·         dependable IT support

·         Buy-in from senior decision makers in the institution

·         Flexibility on behalf of the course facilitators

·         Student engagement 







The UL GEMS Psychiatry Experience


For those that might not be familiar, the University of Limerick Graduate Entry Medical school offers a 4-year graduate entry programme. The school follows a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approach in the pre-clinical years (years 1 and 2) which heavily promotes self-directed learning (SDL). This ethos is carried through into the clinical years of year 3 and 4 where students complete their clerkship style modules in General Practice, Surgery, Medicine, Paediatrics, Obs/Gynae. and Psychiatry.  Quite unlike other medical schools in Ireland, the GEMS programme delivers the Psychiatry component in the final rather than the penultimate year.

There are approximately 125 students in a UL GEMS year. They are divided into five groups as they rotate through the final clerkship modules in Year 4. They are a diverse group in terms of demographics but generally share some important qualities. The medical school experience tends to promote resilience and pragmatism which in turn is important for working as a Doctor.

Furthermore, the Psychiatry module is taught using a case-based discussion learning (CBD) approach following the principles of both PBL and SDL. Teaching for the course is delivered in two hubs (Limerick and Portlaoise) to cater for students on clinical placement across the breadth of the Mid-West and into the Midlands, from Lisdoonvarna to Naas.  To facilitate this the school has been using video-conferencing equipment for the last 10+ years. 

So not only does the programme have a flair for 3-letter acronyms but you might argue was predisposed to making a smooth transition from a face to face (F2F) or blended learning environment to wholly Online.







Overview of how we tweaked the course


Original Course

Adapted

Mixture of F2F and VC lectures synchronously delivered

Week one was F2F with all lectures online thereafter, majority synchronously some pre-recorded for asynchronous review

F2F Clinical skills sessions

Clinical skills sessions online

5 Clinical Placements

1 clinical placement

Teaching mix of CBD (70%) and lectures

Teaching mix of CBD (70%) and lectures

Assessment via paper based MCQ exam, Three 10-minute OSCES

Assessment via online MCQ and Clinical Reasoning video interpretation

In-training Assessment – case reports and reflective notes

In-training Assessment – case reports and reflective notes and recorded student videos

Number of e-modules to supplement course

Number of e-modules to supplement course

6 weeks duration

4 week duration

F2F – face to face; VC – video conferencing



Virtual Learning Environment (VLE)


There are a variety of different virtual learning environment software packages in use in Medical Education in Ireland. UL GEMS uses SULIS which is a version of the open-source software SAKAI tailored for UL needs. As it is open source it is quite modular and can be integrated with different apps and software. Other commonly used VLE are Blackboard (https://www.blackboard.com/teaching-learning/learning-management) and Moodle https://moodle.org/). Moodle is also used by The College of Psychiatry of Ireland (https://elearning.irishpsychiatry.ie/login/index.php).

The core functions of VLE are to facilitate learning, act as a repository for learning resources, allow the upload of assignments, provide administration tools and facilitate communication. With all new technology there are teething problems and bugs to iron out. The SULIS platform had been in use for over 10 years (with modification along the way) and students in UL are very fluent in its use.



Video Conferencing


While most people have experienced some form of video conferencing before the pandemic, they have probably found their use of this technology massively increased in recent times. Privacy and security are important considerations, as well as reliability. From a patient-doctor perspective there are extra demands around confidentiality, consent and GDPR and specialist suites of software have become available in the recent months.

Bigbluebutton (BBB) https://bigbluebutton.org/ was the software used in UL GEMS which integrates well with SULIS. It allows up to 100 concurrent users (this limitation has been overcome in the last few weeks), allows typical admin privileges and effectively “works out of the box”. You can partition big groups into smaller groups to facilitate small group discussion and other breakout educational activities. The software is web browser based so you don’t need to download or install other software to use it, but a camera or microphone is required.

A basic but very legitimate question is how well smart phones integrate with VLE and VC software. While the combination works in principle, the software is optimised for large rather than small screens.

A neat feature of modern VC software is some echo/reverb cancellation to reduce the disruption caused by unmuted microphones. Another tip is to use a headset or any of the fancy earphones that come inbuilt with microphones that are shipped with most smartphones over the last 10 years.







IT Support


Unfortunately, IT reliability remains one of the biggest hurdles to implementing blended learning or online learning. Both medical students and teaching staff have very little tolerance of technical issues. Behind the scenes good IT support will make sure there is adequate bandwidth and bandwidth optimisation for the VC software. UL GEMS has been very lucky in that they have IT professionals who are both knowledgeable, approachable and easy to work with.

However, one of the best interventions to make sure your online experience works is to get as familiar as possible with how the technology or equipment is supposed to work. Thankfully the vast majority of technical issues are very simple to fix, work round or avoid if you have invested just a small amount of time in getting to know the tech you are working with. You really can’t blame IT for lecturers not knowing their own passwords, etc. It is also really important to have a tried and tested “Plan B” for when things go wrong.



Buy-In from Senior Management


In this particular case UL GEMS and the wider university were completely committed to making things work and facilitating the expansion of online learning. UL GEMS already delivered a lot of material via video conference due to the geographical spread of students during term time.



Course Facilitators 

I was in the perhaps privileged position of acting as a Clinical Tutor in Psychiatry in the University of Limerick while completing a M.Sc in Medical Education. I also completed a certificate in Online Teaching from the National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Along with my previous qualification in Computer Science and IT I found myself somewhat serendipitously prepared to pivot from a Face-to-Face (F2F) course to an Online learning environment.  My colleague Dr. Frank McKenna is similarly fluent in IT with a Business Information Systems background. In terms of his skill-set he also brought experience from sports coaching and business management so between the two of us we had a lot of the skills we could adapt to a new learning environment.

The course facilitators had a very clear ethos about their role which were:

·         motivate the students to participate and engage

·         encourage students to make substantive and relevant responses rather than token contributions

·         moderate student discussion

By striving towards these principles, we created a sense of online community in which the students didn’t feel like the online aspects were tokenistic or something that could just “dial in”. Anonymous student feedback at the end demonstrated that the students found the transition smooth, the quality of the teaching on par to their F2F teaching and generally positive in appraisal.







Student Factors


Students tend to have high intrinsic motivation and a keen interest in performing well. Their background in PBL and SDL makes them self-starters and they tend to approach things from a position of critical appraisal. However, as they are often juggling multiple requirements at the same time (e.g. applications, research and other extra-curricular activities) they are precious with their time and energy. As Graduates with ample life experience and as high fee-paying consumers, they tend to have high expectations of course quality in both content and delivery. The students also tend to have high fluency in the use of technology in education, from laptops and mobile phones, to voice recognition software to handwriting interpreting tablets.

When considering the transition from F2F to online it is prudent to consider some of the moving parts. While you might expect the entire cohort of students in a group to have access to adequately fast broadband, phones or laptops to use and a quiet and safe place to set up this isn’t always the case. UL GEMS has offered an access scholarship scheme aimed at students who entered their undergraduate degree via an Access route and who have been under-represented at University due to their socio-economic backgrounds. Nevertheless, it is important to be mindful of students who might find it difficult to engage in online learning due to shared accommodation, limited WIFI and lack of hardware so that any possible concessions can be made.

So that’s a review of how we adapted Psychiatry teaching at undergraduate level to the COVID-19 pandemic. There may well be different approaches by different schools based on different sets of requirements and circumstances and we would happy to hear about them in the comments. 

And you can follow Kevin on Twitter: @kevinly








Dr. Gerry Rafferty's guest blog

One of the nice things about a blog is that it can remain dormant for a while and then be suddenly reinvigorated by new material.  So when D...