This week I am delighted to welcome yet another graduate of the University of Limerick Medical School as a guest blogger. Dr. Frank McKenna has just completed a year as Clinical Tutor in Psychiatry with UL. During that year, Frank has become immersed in the worlds of medical education and research and his students have been lucky to have had such a talented, wise and dedicated teacher and guide. Frank has provided a very modest biography (see below) so, along with his wide range of accomplishments in his first few years in psychiatry, I must add that he is not just 'a writer of fiction' but an award winning author. For artistic accompaniment this week, Frank has suggested two of his favourites - Limerick artist Annemarie Bourke and Gibraltarian artist Christian Hook.
Frank's biography:
Frank McKenna completed psychiatry BST in
2019 and will commence HST this July. He has spent the intervening time as a
Clinical Tutor in Psychiatry with the University of Limerick (UL). A former
Business and Information Systems graduate who worked in both IT and retail
management, he completed Graduate Entry Medicine in UL in 2015. He has varied
interests within psychiatry including Sports Psychiatry and Narrative Psychiatry.
He is a writer of fiction, and avails of any opportunity to speak to a crowd.
Evening on the Shannon (Annemarie Bourke)
George's Head, Kilkee (Annemarie Bourke)
A Year in Time: Reflection on a year as Clinical Tutor
Affect.
I described it routinely. Congruent and resonant, appropriate and reactive, perhaps
incongruent and blunted, or inappropriate and flattened, or some other
combination of a limited collection of descriptors.
The
lecture notes I inherited likened affect to
the weather, in contrast to mood being the climate. The same simile was on the
same slides when I went through my psychiatry rotation at the University of
Limerick (UL) in 2015. I wasn’t sure about it then and I’m not sure about it
now. But the night before I would first deliver this particular lecture – MSE: Mood, Affect and Risk – after a
little thought, I came to enough clarity to think “I’ll run with it.”
Climate
and mood pervade in the background. They influence the likelihood of what will
be visibly evident at any given time: the weather, or the affect.
By
11am the following morning weather and climate were out the window, where they bloody
well ought to be. Eventually inevitable, this reaction was catalysed by the
twenty-eight gazes that materialised incremental layers of glaze with each of
my attempts to clarify what was becoming increasingly abstract in my own head.
There
is a lot of focus in medical education theory on the value of feedback. I found
that the best feedback is not sought, but evident in the students’ engagement
and in the looks on their faces. This was my principal guiding force: Are they engaged?
I
resorted to being less clever than my predecessors.
We
ask two questions about affect:
(1) How reactive (or resonant)
is it?
(2) How congruent is it with
the patient’s mood?
The
twenty-eight pleasant nods I received allowed me to think this had done the
trick. The students’ first written case presentations at the midway point of their
6-week psychiatry rotation illustrated that the trick certainly had not been done. Patients’ affects were all
manner of verbs and adjectives: “happy”, “crying”, “tense”, “laughing”. Some
were even “good” or “bad.”
I
had a few tries at this. In UL we teach the same course 5 times in the academic
year as students rotate through the psychiatry placement. In the end I think I
had it down, and this came with realising that, in the Mental State Exam, we
are not asking “what is the patient’s
affect?” The question we ask is “how good
is their affect?” That is, how well does their affect represent their mood? Towards
the end of the year, reactive and congruent affects began to stream in, and all
was right in the academic world.
In
July I will start my first post as a Senior Registrar (SR), but for the last
(almost) eleven months I have been outside of clinical training, working
fulltime for UL, teaching psychiatry to medical students.
I
applied for this job for many reasons, but mainly I wanted more teaching
experience and I wanted to get a research boost prior to starting HST.
Teaching
hours were not as many as I expected – guest lecturers deliver about half,
leaving the other half to share between Kevin (my fellow tutor) and myself. Initially
this was a tad disappointing. I was chomping at the bit to strut my stuff, impart
knowledge to, and open the minds of, roomfuls of focused final years. I had
notions. It did not take long to realise the teaching hours I had were plenty,
even ideal; easily enough to maximise teaching skills, time to prepare well, time
to ponder how best to get the content across and afterwards to reflect on to
how to do better.
That
is not to say that time is there to be spent staring out the window, thinking
the long thoughts of youth (not quite applicable in my case anyway, I’m
afraid). The tutors are there to ensure the course runs well. Kevin and I had
the advantage of having both gone through the course as students. The
problem-based philosophy in particular came naturally to us, but still, time
fills up. Scheduling lectures, liaising with lecturers (mainly consultants and
SRs), filling in at teaching when things crop up unexpectedly, takes a chunk
every now and then. Assessment of students is a continual process – monitoring
engagement, assessing written assignments, delivering feedback, identifying the
rare struggler, preparing end of year exams, and not infrequently addressing
students personal or interpersonal issues.
This
year coughed up the particular challenge of creating a new online assessment to
replace the clinical exam. The aim was, in some way, to confirm that this
year’s graduates understand the subtleties of a psychiatric interview – but there
is much more on that in my colleague’s previous posts:
https://psychiatry7trainingtips.blogspot.com/2020/06/guest-blog-part-2-of-dr-kevin-lally.html
https://psychiatry7trainingtips.blogspot.com/2020/06/guest-blog-part-3-of-dr-kevin-lally.html
A
year free of clinical responsibilities is a huge opportunity, not just to boost
research output but also to improve research skills. The former, for me,
despite a lot of work, has been hindered by Covid-19, but I am hoping foundations
are laid to produce results in the months ahead. My research skills, on the
other hand, have vastly developed. Planning projects, proposing to supervisors,
reviewing literature, discussing aims and methodologies, collecting data,
analysing data, writing papers – there is probably no substitute for going
through these processes, and this year I was able to supplement this work by
availing of relevant and useful tutorials and short courses available to
University staff. I am a latent powerhouse of research.
More
than anything else, I have enjoyed the year. Whatever about its place on my CV,
it has allowed me to develop as a teacher, into having a clue and having an
opinion when it comes to research. It has made me continually question my
knowledge, and thus has deepened and broadened my understanding of psychiatry.
It also removed me from the blinkered path from intern to consultant and
broadened the scope of where I think my career could go.
HST
is waiting. I have not seen a patient in a year so in the first days there may
be some toe dipping. Soon enough I will be sailing again, and a year as UL
Clinical Tutor in Psychiatry has given me a greater understanding of the
vastness of the ocean ahead.
Origins (Christian Hook)
La Nostalgia de Londres (Christian Hook)